Système d’information en philosophie des sciences
Information system on philosophy of science

ImprimerEnvoyer le lien

ARTICLE

Contextualist Approaches to Epistemology: Problems and Prospects

  • Pages : 143 à 172
  •  
  • Support : Electronic document
  • Edition : Original
  •  
  • DOI : 10.1007/s10670-004-0489-3
  • URL : Lien externe
  •  
  • Date de création : 04-01-2011
  • Dernière mise à jour : 01-06-2011

Résumé :

Anglais

In this paper we survey some main arguments for and against epistemological contextualism. We distinguish and discuss various kinds of contextualism, such as attributer contextualism (the most influential version of which is semantic, conversational, or radical contextualism); indexicalism; proto-contextualism; Wittgensteinian contextualism; subject, inferential, or issue contextualism; epistemic contextualism; and virtue contextualism. Starting with a sketch of Dretskes Relevant Alternatives Theory and Nozicks Tracking Account of Knowledge, we reconstruct the history of various forms of contextualism and the ways contextualists try to handle some notorious epistemological quandaries, especially skepticism and the lottery paradox. Then we outline the most important problems that contextualist theories face, and give overviews of their criticisms and defenses as developed in this issue.

 

Haut de page

Retour à la page précédente

Mentions légales © SIPS, 2022.
Dernière mise à jour : Lundi 24 janvier 2022