Explanatory Independence and Epistemic Interdependence

A Case Study of the Optimality Approach

Envoyer le lien

Article

    • Pages : 213 à 233
    •  
    • Support : Electronic document
    • Langues : Anglais
    • Édition : Original
    •  
    • DOI : 10.1093/bjps/axp022
    •  
    • Date de création : 31-01-2015
    • Dernière mise à jour : 31-01-2015

    Résumé

    Anglais

    The value of optimality modeling has long been a source of contention amongst population biologists. The author presents a view of the optimality approach as at once playing a crucial explanatory role and yet also depending on external sources of confirmation. Optimality models are not alone in facing this tension between their explanatory value and their dependence on other approaches; it is suspected that the scenario is quite common in science. This investigation of the optimality approach thus serves as a case study, on the basis of which it is suggested that there is a widely felt tension in science between explanatory independence and broad epistemic interdependence, and that this tension influences scientific methodology. – Contents : 1. Introduction. The optimality approach and its detractors; The optimality approach and antireductionism; – 2. Explanatory Independence. Optimality explanations; Causal patterns and context of inquiry; – 3. Epistemic Interdependence. What optimality models overlook; Mutual epistemic dependence; – 4. Balancing Independence and Interdependence.

    Mots-clés