Cet ouvrage, qui vient clore l’édition des Œuvres complètes de Cournot, rassemble la totalité des mémoires, articles et comptes rendus scientifiques et philosophiques publiés par Cournot, ainsi que ses Souvenirs, sa correspondance officielle et privée et un ensemble de documents relatifs à sa carrière universitaire. Ces textes, abondamment annotés, restituent le parcours scientifique et philosophique de Cournot, éclairant la genèse de sa pensée. Ils dressent aussi le tableau de la vie politique, savante et universitaire du XIXe siècle, telle que nous la livre ce témoin privilégié que fut le professeur, inspecteur et recteur Cournot, constituant ainsi une source particulièrement riche d’informations et de réflexions sur le développement de la connaissance scientifique et de la réflexion philosophique au XIXe siècle. – Partie I, Mémoires, articles chapitres additionnels, comptes rendus scientifiques et philosophiques : Section I, Articles du Bulletin de Férussac; Section II, Comptes rendus du Bulletin de Férussac; Section III, Articles publiés dans Le Lycée; Section IV, Comptes rendus du Lycée, du Journal officiel de l’instruction publique et des Annales des sciences de l’observation; Section V, Thèses et Addition; Section VI, Éléments de mécanique; Section VII, Mémoire sur les applications du calcul des chances à la statistique judiciaire; Section VIII, Articles du Dictionnaire des sciences philosophiques et autres articles. – Partie II, Souvenirs, correspondances et carrière : Section IX, Souvenirs (1760-1860); Section X, Correspondances; Section XI, Carrière universitaire et académique. M.-M. V.

These essays originated at a conference organized by the unit for History and Philosophy of Science, University of Sydney, in 2009 and focus on one of three themes: the body as an object of inquiry, the body as an instrument of empirical knowledge, and what the editors call "embodied cognition," or consideration of the mind as a part of the body. – It was in 1660s England, according to the received view, in the Royal Society of London, that science acquired the form of empirical enquiry we recognize as our own: an open, collaborative experimental practice, mediated by specially-designed instruments, supported by civil discourse, stressing accuracy and replicability. Guided by the philosophy of Francis Bacon, by Protestant ideas of this worldly benevolence, by gentlemanly codes of decorum and by a dominant interest in mechanics and the mechanical structure of the universe, the members of the Royal Society created a novel experimental practice that superseded former modes of empirical inquiry, from Aristotelian observations to alchemical experimentation. – This volume focuses on the development of empiricism as an interest in the body – as both the object of research and the subject of experience. Re-embodying empiricism shifts the focus of interest to the ‘life sciences’; medicine, physiology, natural history. In fact, many of the active members of the Royal Society were physicians, and a significant number of those, disciples of William Harvey and through him, inheritors of the empirical anatomy practices developed in Padua during the 16th century. Indeed, the primary research interests of the early Royal Society were concentrated on the body, human and animal, and its functions much more than on mechanics. Similarly, the Académie des Sciences directly contradicted its self-imposed mandate to investigate Nature in mechanistic fashion, devoting a significant portion of its Mémoires to questions concerning life, reproduction and monsters, consulting empirical botanists, apothecaries and chemists, and keeping closer to experience than to the Cartesian standards of well-founded knowledge. – Contents : I. The body as object of inquiry (continues and in some cases extends historical work from the past two decades that has inserted the sciences of life into the narrative of early modern science); – II. The body as instrument (includes five essays which define "instrument" in a variety of ways); – III. Embodied minds (both more unified and more philosophical than the previous sections). M.-M. V.

The paper focuses on the different concepts of “common sense” and investigates this diversity through an examination of its ancient and modern equivalents. One thing that it is worth noticing, though, is that contemporary areas of science such as philosophy of science, artificial intelligence, psychology, social science, linguistics, ethnomethodology, or philosophy of ordinary language also exhibit the “common sense” phenomenon.